Getting close to the deadline for voting in the Eurasia Mining EGM. I can’t tell you how to vote, but obviously I was in favour as the Board have asked us to support their resolution.
Send a message via Secure Chat if you have it with your broker like HL or Halifax, II offer it on their website if you adjust your settings to allow Auto Actions linked to your account, ring them up if not. Appreciate X-O charge and the Freetrade ones don’t offer it as they are a no frills service.
Seen a lot of speculation over why they want the resolution to pass and there are many valid reasons it would seem. All we know for sure is that is will assist in their negotations as they work towards a binding proposal.
I just feel that regardless of the outcome I like to know I’ve done what I can to support the companies I invest in – it’s a basic right of being a shareholder and a way to have your voice heard. If you don’t vote it negates your commentary to a large extent.
Hopefully they get this over the line and can continue with their strategy to boost shareholder value which has been amazing to see over the last 18 months.
Further details available in the recent EGM rns and on link below :
The recent news about the Rosgeo JV , the appointment of Tamerlan Abdikeev , the mention of Japanese interest , and the EGM announcement  is exciting but confusing. So, this is my thought process in a somewhat chronological order along with some speculation and why I think it is important that we log in and vote yes in the EGM to support our BOD and help them increase shareholder value.
Brief overview of MT: •Current reserves in mining permit  = 2.2Moz Pd equivalent  •‘Target’ resources within the flanks licence  = 13.3Moz Pd equivalent  •Exclusivity zone (not ours …yet) = 7Moz  •Wider Monchegorsky district (not ours… yet) = 17.7Moz  •So, total potential resources as of now 15.5Moz  •Mine plan to produce 1Moz pa  •EPC contract signed with Sinosteel to develop mine if needed 
Interesting note: At 01/07/2020 the additional advertise incentive over and above the current 15.5Moz was “Explorationupside: Expanding mineable reserve base via acquisition of adjacent licences.” . As of the 09/04/2021circular it now states “Expansion: mineable reserve base via the Rosgeo JV.” . Looks like this Rosgeo JVgives them all the additional licences they wanted.
Screenshots for the lazy:
The four pits close to the MT licence: •Are open pit and suitable for toll treatment 
•Incorporated into current (1Moz pa) or new (more than 1Moz pa) mine plan 
•Can use current infrastructure at MT 
•Faster to develop (get cash quicker) 
•Lower cost to develop 
•Lower cost to run 
•Safer to operate 
•Gives buyer the option to transition to underground mining [9, 10]
•Lower cut off grade so more resources economical due to lower costs [12, 13]
The addition of these 4 open pits surrounding MT could constitute the 40Moz Pd that was mentioned in previous RNS  and in the investor presentation . The RNS states that in addition to our 15Moz:
additional potential resources occurring within 5km of the Monchetundra Mining license andareas neighbouring the Company’s deposits of c.4Moz;
And additional potential resources within the wider Monchegorsk district in which theMonchetundra license is located of c.21M oz.
The potential for the area could be 40M oz of PGMs, but as stated above this data has not beenindependently verified by Eurasia and other than the area covered by the Company’s existinglicence the Company does not yet have any other licences in the area”.
In the image below, the green part is our current MT licence. The blue parts are Rosgeo licences. If those licences are part of the Rosgeo JV then they could contain the 4 open pits and could constitute the “wider Monchegorsk district” mentioned in the RNS.
The additional five pits (not close to the current MT licence):
Are a mix of open and underground pits 
DD been completed here 
20km of exploration and 12 thousand samples taken acros these 5 pits 
Likely need to develop a mine plan for these as not stated if this has been done
This could take us to > 2Moz pa. See GMF calculations for impact of this 
SPECULATION – This sounds suspiciously like Volchetuntra .
The RNS on 04/12/2019  said: “The Company would also like to highlight further regional potential specifically in the Volchetundra Project, previously operated by the Company under a Joint Venture with Anglo American from 2004 to 2011, and subsequently surrendered to focus on the Monchetundra Project. Volchetundra occurs 5 km from Monchegorsk. This high palladium deposit now becomes of interest given the recent price appreciation in palladium and the future price outlook. Palladium prices through 2011 averaged less than $600 per ounce. The Company’s database of proprietary information including 12,000m of drilling will be compiled in due course to reassess the projects future potential development. If the Company did want to explore this project again, it would have to re-apply for the relevant licences and there can be no guarantee that they will be granted.” Now the description of the 5 pits from the 26/04/2021 RNS  is the following: “A further five mostly open pit palladium, platinum, copper, nickel and cobalt assets are included in the JV, where Eurasia has carried out due diligence including c.20km of exploration drilling and some 12 thousand samples taken by Eurasia”
Volchetundra seems to fit the bill from the descriptions. It is also curious that two applications were submitted by Northern Palladium recently. One was for Volchetundra (red box in map below), the other for a zone north of Volchetuntdra (the yellow box in map below). Their application was rejected for Volchetundra but was accepted for the area north. Looks like Volchetundra was being kept for someone else. Maybe for us.
To put the value of the Rosgeo JV into context, EUA’s agreement to acquire the Monchetundra exploration licence began in April 2005 . They worked their way through drilling and studies to gain mining permits  and only got the flanks licence in August 2020 . 15 years of work (minimum). This JV offers us the opportunity to acquire the licences to 104.6Moz platinum equivalent that has already been through this entire process, including the feasibility study. Massive positive for an AIM exploration company and massive uplift in shareholder value despite what the SP says.
Combining MT with JV assets:
As per the circular released on 09/04/2021  “The Rosgeo JV aims to establish a world class PGM district on Kola with the Monchetundra asset as the cornerstone project.”. The company clearly are in a great position to sell on the entire Kola districts as it is advertised as a PGM and battery metals district. The reason I think it is all being sold together as opposed to selling MT and keeping the new Rosgeo JV assets is that:
They state Monchetuntra is cornerstone of the project. It can no longer be the cornerstone of the Kola district if it is sold off, splitting up the project.
Company boasts strong negotiating power as the own MT. MT is the only mining licence there with anexclusivity radius. Selling it off therefore means we have no mining licence and giving away our advantage. With the additional assets we can now say that “if you want access to MT then you have to buy the lot”
The information tells us that the 4 open pits that can use the current (or new) MT plan and infrastructure. If we sell MT then we would need another plan for the 4 new open pit assets or pay the buyer of MT to use the infrastructure that we just sold. Do not think our BOD would enjoy that idea.
If we sold MT then a buyer would now be the dominant player in the region and we would be left with the JV assets but no mining licence and no guarantee that anyone would buy the remaining assets. Better say we will only part with MT if the additional assets are bought too. We win from a larger sale, Rosgeo win as they can piggyback on our sale to offload their licences and make money, the buyer wins as they get the entire region to themselves.
With all the great stuff above its easy to ask why the BOD need the power to allot shares. Surely, we can just sell the lot now. Well, there are any number of reasons but for me the simplest is usually the correct one. Simplest one being Japanese interest . The BOD state that they are:
“confident that the ability to allot securities and demonstrate a capacity to develop the Kola PGM and battery metals district independently of other strategic options available to the Company benefits the Company and its Shareholders by improving Eurasia’s negotiating position.”
They also announced out of the blue that ‘Eurasia Japan’ exists, that Tamerlan Abdikeev has been doing a grand old job bringing Japanese interest in our assets, and they made a point of mentioning that Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) took a 12.95% position in Hanwa’s acquisition of Platinum Group Metals Ltd in South Africa . We know that EUA do not pad out RNS announcements with fluff so there is a clear reason to mentioning JOGMEC and Hanwa. In my opinion, they will be involved in the sale and they are following the same model they used at Bushveld (i.e. Hanwa buy their position (or all of it) with JOGMEC support).
So, if the sale FSP is almost complete, how does raising cash benefit shareholders more than just selling now? A few reasons spring to mind. Some more realistic than others:
1.Rather than activate the Rosgeo earn out, we just buy the licences. See GMF78 calculations . 2. The additional 25% Rosgeo stake. Maybe the audit is complete, and we are going to buy the 25% so that we can sell it all. The RNS  states: a.“Eurasia also has a call option to acquire 25% from Rosgeo after completion of thereserves audit under the JORC Code.” 3. There is 20% of MT out there in the ether that the BOD might have their sights on. 4. Could be anything else. One thing is for sure. The EGM is for the benefit of shareholder value. A massive turn out of PI voting in support of the BOD will speak volumes so make sure you getyour vote in. EUA 2021!
** This post will be added to as more of the market is found.
So where do all the millions of ounces that get mined every year end up? Long story short, the automotive sector dominates. But who are the main players, the secondary traders and refiners. Whilst I believe a miner is most likely to buy Eurasia Mining, it is almost a certainty the buyer will be involved in the sector already. So consider this a definitive list of options!
DD&Co Limited Dillon Gage Metals Eiger Trading Advisors Ltd. G4S Cash Solutions UK Ltd. G4S International Logistics (UK) Limited Gemini Industries Inc. Gerrards (Precious Metals) Ltd. GFI Securities Limited ICAP Securities Limited Inspectorate International Ltd. Ivanhoe Mines SA Krastsvetmet Loomis International (UK) Ltd Malca-Amit Commodities Ltd. Mastermelt Ltd. Metals Focus Limited Ospraie Management, LLC Platinum Group Metals Ltd. Richmond Commodities Limited Sojitz Corporation Techemet Metal Trading LLC Tharisa Plc Tokuriki Honten Co. Ltd Tullett Prebon (Europe) Limited Western Digital Corporation Wogen Resources Ltd. World Platinum Investment Council
From 2020 Annual Report – EUR 59.1bn. German giant of industry, PGM in Catalysts division with American HQ
6.69 trillion yen (2019 annual report). This is the trading division of Toyota.
From 2019 Annual Reports (2020 due in May). A true giant on the global stage. $12.5bn from metal products and $10bn from mineral resources.
From 2020 Annual Reports. $8.4bn from PGM mining
In the 2019 financial year, Heraeus generated revenues of €22.4 billion with approximately 14,900 employees in 40 countries. Heraeus is now one of the top 10 family-owned companies in Germany and holds a leading position in its global markets.
2020 Consolidated revenue increased 15% y-o-y to $15.5bn owing to higher prices of palladium and rhodium as well as the scheduled ramp-up of Bystrinsky project; EBITDA decreased 3% y-o-y to $7.7bn. Largest Palladium miner in world and neighbour to Eurasia site at Monchetundra.
1.7 trillion Yen (2021 estimates) Hanwa is a trading company with operations spanning non-ferrous metals, metals and alloys, food, petroleum and chemicals, machinery, lumber and many other business sectors. The company has solid positions in all of these businesses.
1.46 trillion yen (2021 estimates), precious metals division, invests in copper mines overseas, urban mining (recycling)
Trading arm of Honda, responsible for over 6% of transactions in PGM each year (from their website)
Net profit of $1.78 billion in 2020, the highest for any year since it was formed in 2013, revenue increased to $7.74 billion from $5.04 billion.
MATSUDA SANGYO CO.,LTD. is located in SHINJUKU-KU, TOKYO, Japan and is part of the Steel Service Centers & Other Metal Wholesalers Industry. MATSUDA SANGYO CO.,LTD. has 1,436 total employees across all of its locations and generates $1.91 billion in sales (USD). There are 52 companies in the MATSUDA SANGYO CO.,LTD. corporate family. (DNB report)
SAXONIA Holding GmbH has 710 total employees across all of its locations and generates $732.96 million in sales (USD). There are 17 companies in the SAXONIA Holding GmbH corporate family. (DNB report)
From 2020 Annual Report, EBIDTA $69.6m
C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG is located in Wimsheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany and is part of the Primary Metals Manufacturing Industry. C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG has 198 employees at this location and generates $68.20 million in sales (USD). There are 7 companies in the C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG corporate family.
Think of it as a handy port of call for background research. Some companies are good enough to list some details on their website, such as Honda Trading involved in over 6% of PGM volume annually. Only an affiliate member so will need to go through the full list to work out how many other major players are hiding in plain view!
Finally, the Matthey report is an excellent industry leading annual report. A must read for anyone investing in the PGM sector.
Key highlights (from Matthey report)
The platinum market remained in deficit in 2020, with sharply lower supplies, and strong investment demand.
Autocatalyst consumption plunged by 22%, with steep falls in European diesel car production.
Industrial purchasing was more resilient, especially in China, where petrochemical and glass expansions went ahead.
Chinese jewellery demand slumped to a 20-year low, although record gold prices encouraged some retailers to stock more platinum.
Japan saw heavy bar purchasing in the first half of 2020, while ETF investment turned strongly positive in the second half.
Primary platinum supplies shrank by 20%, due to processing outages and pandemic-related disruption in South Africa.
Auto recycling contracted sharply on weak diesel scrap volumes in Europe and processing capacity constraints.
The palladium market remained in significant deficit, driving the price to all-time highs in early 2020.
A plunge in vehicle output was partly offset by higher palladium loadings on gasoline vehicles.
Consumption in chemical catalysts remained buoyant, with strong investment in new plants in China.
Other industrial demand fell sharply, due to COVID-related disruption and price-driven thrifting.
Investment demand remained negative, with further redemption of palladium ETFs.
Primary supplies were hit by mine closures and processing outages, while autocatalyst recycling also slowed.
The rhodium market moved deeper into deficit as supplies dropped faster than demand.
With tighter emissions limits boosting catalyst loadings, auto demand fell by less than 10%.
Purchases by glass companies plunged, as high prices stimulated thrifting.
Primary supplies contracted sharply due to mine disruption and processing outages in South Africa.
The rhodium price surged to an all-time record of $17,000 in December 2020.
Outlook for 2021, all pgm
Pgm supply and demand are forecast to bounce back in a V-shaped recovery in 2021.
Autocatalyst demand will recover strongly, on higher car output and stricter emissions limits for trucks in China.
Industrial consumption will remain robust, with pgm use in chemicals set to reach an all-time high.
After the surprise RNS Friday 26.3 after hours, I thought it would be useful to try and make some sense of events and how they fit in with what we already know. I won’t go over ground covered brilliantly by others such as Alta_Traako here. We are witnessing the birth of a new district for PGM mining, at a time when rivals are struggling and historic deficits are scheduled to widen.
I think the best approach is to treat this JV in isolation, but also reflect on how it impacts on existing valuations as it is now impossible to ignore that Eurasia have clearly made a good impression on the Russian State. Anyone looking to buy the company has the extra reassurance that they are buying a ESG focussed, Govt approved entity, with connections at the highest levels. A JV like this is not done overnight and Rosgeo work with the major players globally, it neatly explains why the delays in FSP mattered.
Eurasia are now empire building on Kola Peninsula, making the most of the opportunities presented by Nornickel flooding woes and AISC in lowest quartile globally for production.
I believe you can make the case now for reducing the WACC to 17% at Monchetundra on the basis of the State support shown to the company and the flank approval since last time ACF valued the company. This revises the valuations slightly.
I strongly believe they are doing this to boost the final sale, by wrapping up additional areas around Monchetundra, they are giving a buyer confidence they have the area to themselves. Whether it ends up being Nornickel or a new player in Russia, they are buying a lifetime supply of PGM with 100 years LOM if they wish – or an even bigger mining plan than the 1Moz is on the way…
How do you value the option to acquire 75% of 104.6Moz Pt equiv ?
Option 1 – In-situ valuations
Using latest spot pricing of $1180/oz for Platinum (and why did they present resources in Platinum, we want to know what other metals are there – seen some Rhodium mentioned today!), calc as follows :
$1180/oz * 104,600,000 * 75% = $92.5bn approx
What is that worth to EUA though ?
If we are working on minimal information, a ready rule in gold exploration is to use $20/oz for inferred resources, $30/oz for measured and indicated and upwards of $150/oz for proven and probable resources.
So which category does the 104.6Moz fit into? I make the case for it being closer to measured and indicated category, given Rosgeo and Absolute Precision were working the areas just last December (looking back a clue something was happening!)
We can only work off given information though, so I take $20/oz for now :
$20/oz * 104,600,000 * 75% = $1.56bn approx
Two alternative options are to take a percentage of the current In-situ value and apply that to the JV area. Working with known data for Monchetundra reveals at 28p share price we are currently valued at 3.4% in-situ assets. I believe this is currently undervalued and a 5% of In-situ would be an appropriate upper limit for the size of resources at Kola.
3.4% * $1180 * 104,600,000 * 75% = $3.14bn
5% * $1180 * 104,600,000 * 75% = $4.68bn
So as soon as the company progress with the JV and we get details on exploration licencing, I would be happy proposing a value of between $1.5bn-$4.6bn to the JV based on a sensible % of in-situ asset values.
The key for me is that they progress asap on this, especially if the flooded mines in Norilsk are out of action for a year or indefinitely. If potential becomes reality, the numbers get bigger!
Option 2 – EBITDA multiples
Lets fast forward a few years, whoever owns the assets have brought them into production and they are producing min 1Moz a year PGM, using Pt equiv to be pessimistic. With 104.6Moz to play with, a 100yr LOM gives a lot of certainty to the owner, so a 9.5x EBITDA multiple (mining industry average) would be appropriate. I assume the same $350/oz AISC as given by the company for Monchetundra.
($1180 – $350)/oz * 1Moz Pt * 75% = $622.5m a year profit before tax (EBITDA)
However, who is happy with mining for 100 years, better to make the most of your opportunity and scale up further. The following table presents some numbers to choose your favourite from :
So in summary, a fully producing JV, assuming the 75% ownership, would be generating between $622m to $1867m profit a year, valued at between $5.9bn and $17.7bn depending on how much they scale up.
Option 3 – Net Present Value NPV and Free Cash Flow FCF
This is the best option for valuing a mining project, but we need more data to make this accurate! Again, it is speculating a few years down the track about intentions and plans. Are they planning to use the facilities at Monchetundra or build additional ones. As I suspect these 9 areas are all intended to be sold together with MT, I will value it very roughly on the basis it doesn’t need much capex to bring to life, beyond what is planned for MT.
Please note though, without a bigger mining plan, we are only using up 20% of the available resources by 2049, so this will seem pessimistic in comparison to other methods :
Option 3.1 – Mine 19.5Moz by 2049 at 75% owned (25 years production from 2024)
Estimated free cash flow of $14.1bn, net present value $1.8bn, still got 85Moz of Pt equiv left worth tens of $ billions in-situ !
Option 3.2 – Super Turbo Beast Mode – buy out Rosgeo and mine the lot in 25 years
Based on 104.6Moz Pt equiv – estimated free cash flow of $68.7bn, net present value $16.5bn
Based on 50Moz Pd equiv (alternative estimate of resources – guesswork) – estimated FCF of $32.4bn and NPV $8.9bn
Shows why we need a full mining plan to use accurate valuations and details of the resources to be mined. Please note, annual global production means this is unlikely to ever happen but it pleases the uber bulls to see the potential! This also backs up Option 2 valuations based on EBITDA at the upper end.
Tackling the naysayers and doubters
To answer a challenge I’ve seen posted around, EUA haven’t spent $0.5m for 75% of the 104.6Moz, it is an intial payment that grants exclusivity on the 9 areas for 24 months. Anyone claiming this is the worth of all that PGM is not worth listening to!
The relevant part of the RNS makes it clear enough what is going on:
It doesn’t mean the FSP has failed either, nor does it mean it is further delayed. Simply put, it is in full swing until an official RNS is released either confirming a sale or an end to the process. The company are very bullish about prospects when you read the comments made by Chairman and CEO :
Another negative comment has been about the cost of acquiring the licences they need and what valuation will be apportioned to the project. Thankfully, Eurasia have done this before, most recently back in 2018 when MT got a mining licence.
If we allow a little inflation, the £48.8k paid for 20% deposit on the licence scales up to a deposit of £500k for 9 licence areas. So it looks like Eurasia have paid the correct deposit for the options if they were buying in open market. This would mean Eurasia need to find another £2m if the relationship is linear. At this time I am uncertain whether the fee is linked to the area of resources though, in which case it would be slightly more once we know the specific area details.
Given they mentioned cash of $6m, they either have enough or they don’t, I assume if they are proceeding along these lines, either Eurasia or the new owner will reveal such matters at the appropriate time. It is insignificant to the value on offer once licences granted.
Summary of Valuations
If you made it this far, well done!
Since I last calculated things, GBP has strengthened against USD, meaning there are some differences. That said, external events can have a bigger impact on these numbers. If the Nornickel mines are lost for a year or more, then expect Platinum and Palladium to be a lot higher in price soon.
In terms of the Kola JV, I didn’t want to jump straight to fair value once the licences are all granted. I think this is a given, but appreciate it will take some time and money to get there. As you can see though, it will be well worth it!
In terms of a short term valuation, clearly we should be moving up from 28p towards the fair values assigned to the various projects EUA have underway. What happens next is down to the market of course, but for potential alone I wouldn’t be surprised if we reach all time highs in the coming weeks.
The FSP is in full swing, Eurasia are carrying on business and adding value to Monchetundra with this new JV, I can only applaud their strategy and execution to date.
My good friend Alta has put together his thoughts on the RNS 26.3.21 – Sharing so more can see :
The Rosgeo Agreement allows Eurasia to gain a 75% equity stake in each of the nine new mining assets (the “Additional Assets”). The remaining 25% equity stakes will continue to be held by Rosgeo. • 75% stake in 9 different assets • US$0.5 million paid initially for access to all 9 assets. • Free to choose which, if any, assets we want. No penalty if we withdraw.
Further payments due should EUA progress to development of any assets.
Four key points about further payments
The earn out structure means we do not need to fork out cash that we cannot afford to potentially not profit. Cost is spread out as we develop (i.e. not risky).
the cost we need to pay is capped at 75% of the value that would have been attained if the sites were auctioned. This is crucial as it does NOT mean that it is 75% of the current or future value, but 75% of the auction cost. (i.e. very cheap)
No upfront cost
Rosgeo at “arm’s length”. No interference. Peace for us. Free money for them. Win win. The Additional Assets have a total of 104.6 Moz Platinum equivalent resources = $124billion. Feasibility study done and reserves approved by state (i.e. no exploration risk). EUA has already invested some US$8.3 million across the Additional Assets so likely know most of it very well through previous campaigns. Will implement EPCF to develop. 4 pits have already been worked on extensively around our current MT licence so EUA know them well. The ore at these 4 pits are suitable for toll treatment (i.e. using current infrastructure the MT plant to generate immediate cash from at a very low cost low cost). Everything is already in place for this to start ASAP. They are also open pit so usual benefits apply (fast development, less risk, significantly lower costs etc. etc.) 5 more pits seem to be a mix on open and underground. DD and analyses have done here too but likely not as well-known as the 4 pits that sit beside out current licences. Exact make up not specified. Also, no mention off toll treatment so likely far more expensive to develop and operate that the other 4. Key for us and likely the development of these Additional Assets is that this does not affect the FSP. “The Company’s existing mining operations in West Kytlim and Monchetundra will not be affected by the JV”. FSP still underway meaning everything we were waiting on is still coming but with an additional $124billion worth of metal to play with.
Scenarios I see listed from most to least likely (my opinion).
Full sale of MT and WK. We get the sale that we initially expected then have the Additional Assets for future dividends or another sale/ series of sales. This makes share holders happy with the biggest pay off plus more to come. From BOD perspective this keeps all long term/ short term investors and institutions very happy while maintaining their dominant status in the region going forward.
Full sale of MT, WK, and Additional Assets (the one I want but cannot allow myself to think about). Bidders may have wanted access to the whole area. So EUA get that access and sell it on. Would be an amazing buyout but seems like it is too expensive to buy at once (in my mind) and we have a 2- year period to agree to develop and then the earn out structure becomes active. Seems strange to get all of this in place to then sell it on. BOD will do what is best for shareholders though.
Sell MT and JV at WK and Additional Assets. Selling MT gives shareholders the initial dividend but also allows the company to keep some of the proceeds for WK development. The current EPCF mentioned for the Additional Assets obviously cannot be used at WK so we would need to finance tis another way. Selling MT could allow this without getting another part involved in the financing while keeping shareholders happy with a much-deserved dividend.
Sell WK and JV at MT and the Additional Assets. Selling WK brings in cash to help develop MT, Additional assets. No need for WK since the Additional Assets are ready to generate cash flow short and long term. Toll treatment on turn-key basis.
An eventful start to the year with 3 significant RNS updates to consider. I’ll discuss each one below but my main thought is that we are now oversold and undervalued. The resources remain as they were. Non-binding bids are only one step away from an offer the Company could put to shareholders. The company has the DFS approval for West Kytlim which pushes things along. Plus with platinum on a rising trend we shouldn’t underestimate the contribution this mine could make to a future owners’ annual profits.
Having researched extensively with many others since 2019 and gathered the opinions of over 1400 members of our Telegram group, including some of the largest private holders of EUA there, the calmness shown this last week speaks volumes. We estimate to be holding well over 10% of all stock between us. Being able to discuss matters calmly and respectfully has been a great help to many. If you want to join we are fully open, just follow the link :
It wouldn’t surprise me if we see some significant buying in the next week, also wouldn’t surprise me if the Company release a significant RNS during February. A February timeline would fit with previous mentions I feel. With holidays out of the way, the progress whilst delayed should not be forgotten about. If I decide to increase my holdings in the coming days I’m sure you will spot the buy! I remain as confident as ever in my predictions and wish every investor well in these difficult times.
14 January 2021 – Eurasia Mining Plc – Update on Formal Sale Process
Eurasia Mining Plc
(“Eurasia” or the “Company”), the palladium, platinum, rhodium, iridium
and gold producing company, is pleased to provide an update on the
Formal Sale Process initiated by the Company under the UK Takeover Code.
launching the Formal Sale Process on 1 July 2020, Eurasia and its
advisers have engaged with a wide range of parties, and have to date
received non-binding offers in respect of both a possible acquisition of
the Company as well as other transaction structures.
Progress to date has been slower than expected reflecting the complexity of the process, involving several parties and structures, as well as external factors including COVID-19 related travel restrictions, and more recently delays resulting from western and Russian holiday periods. Notwithstanding these factors, discussions regarding proceeding to binding proposals are continuing. Until a transaction is finally concluded there can be no certainty that a transaction will occur or on what terms.
Further announcements will be made when appropriate.
Main points – multiple expressions of interest are now non-binding offers. Looking to proceed to binding proposals. Note the plural there, they are working towards multiple formal offers. For me a sign of a potential bidding war inside the FSP.
21 January 2021 – Eurasia Mining PLC – West Kytlim DFS Approved
…Christian Schaffalitzky, Executive Chairman commented: “The Directors are pleased with the DFS approval, aimed at production increases, and confirming West Kytlim’s position as the world’s largest operation of this type. After significant capital investment at West Kytlim into the production scale up and into the rehabilitation, the cash position of Eurasia is robust with over $7m, while the Company is pursuing its strategy as previously reported. Further announcements will be made in due course”.
Main points – Great to see DFS approval for WK , allows year round operations for the future owner. Good to see cash position still strong, no need to bolster. The key part – “Company is pursuing its strategy as previously reported.”
28 January 2021 – Eurasia Mining PLC – Share Price Movement & Update
Eurasia Mining plc
has noted the adverse movement in the Company’s share price yesterday,
following announcement of the trade yesterday for 27,400,000 shares by
Alexei Churakov (the “Shares”).
Eurasia had received no notification of this trade prior to it being
reported by Alexei Churakov himself via RNS on 27 January 2021.
Company and its professional advisers continue to work on the Formal
Sale Process as recently reported via RNS of 14 January 2021. The
operations of the Company are ongoing with the DFS for West Kytlim
formally approved as announced on 21 January 2021.
Company has made initial enquiries of Alexei Churakov regarding the
sale of the Shares, and he has now notified the Company that:
· he sold the Shares to cover an urgent and critical cash call,
· all the Shares were acquired by Veles International (“Veles”), a subsidiary of an investment company Veles Capital,
· he has no intention to sell his remaining shares and/or options.
The Company is continuing with these enquiries.
The Company notes that the acquisition by Veles evidences interest in Eurasia among institutional shareholders. Veles is a well-established and one of the oldest professional institutional investors in Russia.
Main points – Company didn’t know anything about this in advance. Was reported as a single transaction away from the market, at the share price of the time. He hasn’t sold all the shares he could have done.
Deloan Investments is under the control of Dmitry Suschov so consider those shares locked away. Similarly the options cannot be exercised at this time. Anything else is only speculation at this stage and we should await a further update when the company concludes its enquiries.
Clearly this event rattled the markets and confidence. Wasn’t ideal timing to release in market hours and not give the company chance to respond, so the share price took a hit.
But everything else remains as it was on 21 January. The Company points this out in the RNS to reassure everyone about the strategy they are pursuing.
Feb 2020 – Neal ‘the deal’ Froneman suggests Sibanye’s next deal would be away from South Africa and in battery metals. “We want to play in the international arena. We are probably ex-growth in South African because of our market position in PGMs,” he said. He also spoke to Bloomberg about growing capacity in the US market though, making a $5bn acquisition of a gold producer, so not directly linked at this time to Eurasia.
Worth noting though that in the infamous tweet by Michael Hammond, South Africa was listed a country interested in Eurasia.
May 2020 – conditions outlined for Sibanye making acquisitions in future Namely cutting debt and returning to dividends for shareholders. So perhaps they aren’t going to be buying anyone in 2020, except…
August 2020 – update on Sibanye H1 results, with impressive profits posted and dividend reinstated for first time since 2016. So the conditions to be met before making an acquisition are in place now. Coped well with Covid restrictions, so expect H2 to be even more profitable as PGM pricing stable.
October 2020 – Sibanye announce new executive appointments. Including Laurent Charbonnier.
“Laurent Charbonnier will be joining the company and assuming the role of EVP Business Development. Laurent has more than 20 years’ experience in investment banking and recently left his role as Managing director and Global Head of Metals & Mining for HSBC, which he occupied for the last eight years.
He was a lead advisor to Sibanye-Stillwater on the acquisitions of Aquarius Platinum, Rustenburg, Stillwater and Lonmin and their related financing (bridge financing, rights issue and bonds).”
A little research on LinkedIn shows Laurent also worked at Credit Suisse and UBS prior to HSBC, being a seasoned professional in the mining investment community and a track record of financing large deals in the PGM sector.
Also in October, Froneman conducts various interviews stating his level of unhappiness with investing in South Africa, talking about battery metals and how he needs to diversify the company to get closer to supply chains and downstream users.
Sibanye under Froneman have shown impressive growth over the years, he isn’t afraid to take risks and has given a clear steer on future direction when you combine these interviews and facts.
They are clearly moving towards an acquisition, whether it is a North American Gold producer, or someone in the battery metals space, or PGM away from South Africa.
With their credit rating improved, finding money to fund an acquisition should be easier too.
Eurasia Mining ticks some boxes for them, especially with Monchetundra on the Kola peninsula. Closer to European markets and large car manufacturers, cheaper cost of extraction.
On the downside, it doesn’t have a lot of gold or as much nickel/copper as other assets.
But the chance to take a crown jewel right on the doorstep of Nornickel, showing Potanin he has a rival, well that might just be the extra ammunition Froneman needs to pull off the PGM deal of the century.
After the approval of the exploration licence for Monchetundra flanks, it is fair to suggest some of the risk in bringing this project to fruition has reduced. West Kytlim is producing in 2020 so I thought it was worth revisiting my WACC/NPV model to see what may be ahead for investors. To that end, I offer 3 calculations, ranging from a very conservative case, my own considered opinion, then finally a bullish case.
I want to acknowledge the flank approval matters. It is a big step forwards for Eurasia Mining. That said, we don’t have a new resource figure to work with, even though I’m sure the strike area at NKT will see this figure increase. The 48400m of drilling data will no doubt take time to process to modern standards and perhaps lower cut off points. So until the company releases an RNS to confirm a resource figure, I will use the 15Moz.
Previous assumptions I’ve made are that it would cost around $750m to build the bigger mine capable of extracting 1000Koz a year, as indicated in the revised plans issued by Eurasia Mining. I have allowed a 1% increase in Palladium which is pessimistic but allows for the price to fluctuate within these parameters and previously used $2000/Oz as the starting point.
Monchetundra – Conservative Case – 46p per share target
This remains the same as my earlier work, using 30% WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) and $2000/Oz for Palladium yields NPV of $2.1bn and equiv share price of 46p when converted
Monchetundra – GMF78 new prediction – 94p per share price target
Palladium is rising again, emission standards will ensure the next 15-20 years will see rising demand once the massive impact of Covid19 has worked through the system. I feel an average of $2200 is reasonable as a starting point for NPV calculations. I’m reducing the WACC to 20% to reflect progress made, but acknowledging it will take time and effort to build a mine of the scale proposed. (Hopefully by the new owner!)
On this model, we see a Free Cash Flow of $24.2bn generated by 2038, with equivalent Net Present Value of $4278m (there’s that number again!)
Monchetundra – Bullish Case – £2.32 per share price target
Now the flank approval is through, the 30% WACC is perhaps excessive and should be reduced to reflect a step closer to full production. How much to reduce is of course a matter of opinion, but 10% WACC would be as far as I would take this. The results are dramatic though. If we uplift the starting Pd price to $2500 as well, I couldn’t make a case for using higher numbers, so this becomes the upper limit on my calculations.
Monchetundra – work out your own valuation!
Thought it might be handy to have a table covering the possibilities in between my conservative and bullish case. Note it isn’t a linear relationship when assessing NPV for an asset, with WACC having a bigger impact. The cheaper you can bring a project to realisation the more profit lies ahead really.
West Kytlim – 17p share target price
We shouldn’t ignore the potential of WK to add value to a full takeover, it also provides a fall back position should the company not like the size of offers. Actively mining in 2020, with the benefit of the $10m to bolster production, I assign a fair value of 17p to this project now, based on being in production and working towards 1Moz total yield.
Given I have predicted 78p takeover since last November, I could keep saying the likelihood is increasing and leave the figure as it was. However, it is impossible to ignore the flank approval and rising palladium price.
Revised total takeover price of 94p – 111p for the whole company based on current information. Willing to revise should new information come to light. It is clear to see why UBS was engaged, this is going to be one of the biggest deals AIM has ever seen. Simply put, when an offer RNS lands, you will have to hold your shares to benefit as the rerate will be almost instant.
Interesting read for anyone already invested or considering an investment in Eurasia Mining LON:EUA
Target price of 70p
As I write this mid August, we have news about Monchetundra flanks to look forward to, along with any updates about the bidding process UBS and CITIC are engaged to deliver. So plenty of fundamentals to support the rising channel.
I’ll forgive Zak for being 8p short of my own targets, plenty of time for a new chart as the weeks progress 👍