Why Monchetundra could be worth >$14bn by 2026

So we know from RNS that West Kytlim is planned for eventual scale up to 2tons a year, probably to show what it is worth to a new owner.

We know there is a ready to go plan for Monchetundra involving SinoSteel for around 4tons (approx 125Koz) a year. Alexei Churakov gave a Kommersant interview in January stating likely EBITDA of $250m from this.

What would happen to share price upon resumption if a similar scale up plan has been devised for Monchetundra to take advantage of the 15Moz resource with flank approval granted?

No point digging out 150kz a year, you’d be there 100 years!

It would make more sense to see them aim higher, maybe a plan for 780Koz so life of mine is around 18-20years. This will take a few years to achieve, but the low cost nature of extraction via open pit will mean new owners can start production by 2021, maybe 2022 at the latest.

Higher potential EBITDA – $1.5bn to $2bn a year means much higher company valuation.

Allow a hefty discount for building the bigger facility, probably around $1bn, you’d still be looking at $4-5bn to ensure you secured the asset that will generate $15-$20bn over less than 20 years.

(This is conservative as well – 15MOz at Pd price each year, less $325/Oz costs)

This may mean some investors need to be a little patient whilst the plans are drawn up. It doesn’t mean Eurasia will be activating the plans, think of it as a feasibility study.

It is very hard not to be optimistic about the future when you work out what this vast resource will yield.

Gulag Capital Partners – Eurasia Mining report

Key Summary

Recommendation BUY
Target price – 70p GBP (+870% vs current share price of 7.20p GBP)

This is very worthwhile reading if considering an investment into EUA. Concise summary of events, detailed risk analysis and considered opinion.

Read Report

Gulag CP - Eurasia Mining - 07 March 2020

Download Report

Disclaimer

Please remember, the value of any investment can go up or down and this article should not be taken as investment advice.

Can Eurasia cover the million ounce Palladium deficit?

With 15 million ounce reserves, it could sort the deficit out for 15 years or so.

Extra potential in wider area for 40 million ounce

Financial Argument

1Moz a year would need a plan to mine 32 tons PGM a year…

Once built, it would yield EBITDA approx $2bn a year net profit assuming AISC of $325/Oz and Pd price around $2325/Oz

Using 5x average as mine life is 15 years, the mine would be worth about $10bn or £2.75 a share for Eurasia Mining when you take into account the 80% ownership

A discussion on Eurasia Mining

The darling of AIM over the last few months, generating more comments, tweets, bulletin board posts than any other share. Founded in 1995, they are a precious metals mining firm with two main areas of interest at Monchetundra and West Kytlim, both in Russia. Low cost, open pit mines with stable power supply and steady political background.

For background information on the company, visit their website at www.eurasiamining.com

Where has share price growth come from?

Lets examine the RNS timeline for EUA :

Increasing from 0.4p in Mid October to 7.2p at time of suspension on 10th February, many investors have profited already. The question remains where it is going to end up at this year.

Where is it heading next?

As Eurasia transitions from exploration and small scale mining to a larger entity, the company has gone into a lockdown of sorts whilst they are assumed to be negotiating the sale of assets. We have had a few pieces of information courtesy of the recent articles in Kommersant :

Key takeaways from these articles are an expected EBITDA of $250m based on 4 tons a year production at Monchetundra, with now another 2 tons of production at West Kytlim to add to their healthy basket of Palladium, Platinum, Rhodium, Copper, Cobalt and Nickel.

I’ve taken the recent suspension to give a fresh perspective on the events of last 3 months. I have extended my timelines on the process of a sale to reflect the complexity and number of different types of bidder who will have differing areas of interest in Eurasia Mining.

“Physical shortage is coming faster than expected” – whilst some wise people have predicted this event would arrive, the mainstream have been oblivious to PGM shortages until this month. This was the key thought for me that unlocked a new way of looking at things.

The shortage coming faster than expected has opened new options. It now makes a lot more sense to attract more interest before letting people bid. Whilst shares are suspended, everyone is locked in and waiting for updates.

Once you have a bid it is harder to get the share price higher compared to leaving things a while and the first bid being bigger. Every week the prices of Pd and Rh are increasing… 

So there we have it. In a couple of years time when both mines at MT and WK are fully operational, you could expect EBITDA between $291m and $437m based on 4 and 2 tons respectively. This is based on approved production plans involving SinoSteel, along with the lowest AISC seen globally in PGM space, approx. $325 per ounce.

Appropriate multiples for a PGM mining outfit are open to debate, the following link gives a good guide to many sectors, so it was felt 9.5x would be a good target to aim for with EUA :

Referencing the tables above, a market valuation of between $3.6bn and $6.7bn is achievable under full production plans. Obviously Eurasia are not at this stage yet, but it won’t be that long in the grand scheme of things, whilst Palladium remains in deficit especially so.

So in conclusion, how much will someone be willing to pay to secure :

  • 15Moz of Palladium Equiv
  • 298,000 tonnes Nickel
  • 229,000 tonnes Copper
  • 11,300 tonnes Cobalt

Is it any wonder people consider EUA a bargain at current prices. When the CITIC tweet is clarified, there will be a lot of interest in taking part in the next phase of action for Eurasia Mining.

Disclaimer

Please remember, the value of any investment can go up or down and this article should not be taken as investment advice.

Power Of 78

A personal site for my investment opinions. Please note the important information below.

Seek professional advice if required

If you are unsure of any investment decision you should seek a professional financial advisor.  PowerOf78 and gmf78 are not registered investment advisers and will not provide investment advice or recommendations. We are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Investment risks

The value of shares can fall as well as rise.  Dividend payments can fall as well as rise. Any information relating the to past performance of an investment or investment service is not a guide to future performance. Share prices may go down as well as up and you may not get back the original amount invested. You should not buy shares with money you cannot afford to lose.